Reżiljenza fl-era tal-IA

L-IA, teknoloġiji bi skop ġenerali, u għaliex ir-reżiljenza hija l-ħidma tal-ġenerazzjoni tagħna.

Minn Wojciech Zaremba

Il-Fondazzjoni OpenAI teżisti biex tiżgura li l-intelliġenza artifiċjali ġenerali tibbenefika lill-umanità kollha.

Ilna naħdmu bla heda biex inżommu l-pass mal-avvanzi mgħaġġla fl-intelliġenza artifiċjali nnifisha. F’April, il-Fondazzjoni ħabbret l-ewwel $100 miljun tagħna f’għotjiet fix-Xjenzi tal-Ħajja u l-Fejqan tal-Mard, bl-ambizzjoni li ngħinu fil-prevenzjoni u t-trattament ta’ mard bħall-Alzheimer billi nisfruttaw intelliġenza artifiċjali avvanzata. Il-ġimgħa li għaddiet, ħabbarna il-programm tagħna Impjiegi u futuri ekonomiċi, bit-tama li nifhmu u nsawru t-tifsira tax-xogħol u tal-prosperità ekonomika għall-ġenerazzjonijiet futuri.

Illum, qed niżviluppaw aktar il-viżjoni tagħna għall-programm ewlieni li jmiss—biex niżguraw li, hekk kif jikbru l-kapaċitajiet tal-IA, il-kapaċità tas-soċjetà li tagħmel użu effettiv minnhom tikber bl-istess rata. Din il-ħidma nsejħulha reżiljenza tal-IA: l-approċċ ekosistemiku meħtieġ biex jittaffew ir-riskji tal-IA, sabiex is-soċjetà tkun tista’ timmassimizza l-benefiċċji tagħha.

Ix-xogħol tagħna diġà beda. Fil-ftit xhur qosra minn meta bdejna l-ħidma tagħna, il-Fondazzjoni qed taħdem biex tiffinalizza aktar minn $130 miljun f’għotjiet lil organizzazzjonijiet permezz tal-programm AI Resilience tagħna, li se jitħabbru pubblikament dalwaqt u b’aktar x’ġej.1

Ix-xejra tat-teknoloġiji trasformattivi

L-importanza tar-reżiljenza tal-IA tinftiehem l-aħjar mill-perspettiva ta’ teknoloġiji tal-passat li sawru b’mod sinifikanti l-istorja tal-umanità.

Kull tant żmien, titfaċċa teknoloġija li tfassal mill-ġdid is-soċjetà mill-pedamenti tagħha. L-ekonomisti jsejħulhom "teknoloġiji għal skop ġenerali." Nar. L-istamperija. L-elettriku L-internet. Kull wieħed minnhom segwa trajettorja simili: innovazzjoni rapida, riskji reali, u istituzzjonijiet jiġru biex ilaħħqu. Iżda kull eżempju juri wkoll x’inhu meħtieġ biex teknoloġija qawwija ssir sigura.

In-nar għamel iċ-ċiviltà umana possibbli. Dan żammna sħan, sajjarilna l-ikel, u pproteġiena mill-predaturi. Ħaraq ukoll il-bliet tagħna sal-art. Maż-żmien, is-soċjetajiet żviluppaw ir-reżiljenza: materjali reżistenti għan-nar, netwerks tal-idranti, dipartimenti professjonali tat-tifi tan-nar, u kodiċijiet tal-bini. Ekosistema, saff b’saff.

L-elettriku segwa l-istess mogħdija. Wara li l-Pearl Street Station ta’ Edison dawwal lil Manhattan fl-1882, l-elettriku ġab miegħu nirien, elettrokuzzjonijiet u paniku pubbliku. Mingħajr protezzjonijiet bħal wajers iżolati, salvavita, u kodiċijiet, ħaddiema u persuni fil-qrib ġew elettrokutati fi bliet madwar il-pajjiż. Il-bliet iddibattew dwar jekk l-esperiment għandu jiġi abbandunat għalkollox. Minflok, hekk kif it-teknoloġija avvanzat, waqqafna korpi indipendenti tal-ittestjar bħal Underwriters Laboratories, standards tal-industrija bħan-National Electrical Code, u investiment pubbliku li wassal l-elettriku lil komunitajiet li s-suq kien ħalla warajh. Kull saff għamel l-elettriku aktar sikur u aktar aċċessibbli; illum, tant hu sikur li tifel jista’ jixgħel swiċċ u jidher id-dawl.

Hekk tidher ir-reżiljenza meta titwettaq kif suppost.

L-IA teħtieġ ekosistema ta’ reżiljenza

L-intelliġenza artifiċjali qed issegwi l-istess trajettorja bħal teknoloġiji preċedenti, iżda miexja b’veloċità bla preċedent.

L-IA għadha fil-bidu tagħha, iżda l-benefiċċji diġà huma ċari: qed tnaqqas ix-xkiel biex wieħed jibda negozju, twessa’ l-aċċess għall-edukazzjoni, tħaffef l-iskoperta xjentifika, u tittrasforma l-mediċina.

Fl-istess ħin, ir-riskji qed jitfaċċaw bl-istess ħeffa—u bħal riflessjoni fil-mera tal-benefiċċji tal-IA. L-istess tkabbir li joħloq industriji ġodda jista’ jikkawża bidla radikali fl-industriji eżistenti u jfixkel il-karrieri. L-istess sistemi li jistgħu jgħinu liż-żgħażagħ jitgħallmu u joħolqu jistgħu jwasslu wkoll għal imġiba negattiva. L-għodod li jħaffu r-riċerka bijoloġika jistgħu jbaxxu l-ostaklu għall-ħolqien ta’ patoġeni ta’ ħsara. U l-kapaċità tal-IA li tikteb kodiċi, f’idejn mhux korretti, tista’ thedded l-infrastruttura kritika.

It-tim inizjali ta’ OpenAI kien jemmen li l-iżgurar li l-AI tkun ta’ benefiċċju għas-soċjetà kien jiddependi primarjament fuq is-soluzzjoni tal-problema teknika tal-allinjament. Dan jibqa’ kruċjali—u ċentrali għall-ħidma tagħna—iżda issa nemmnu li huwa biss parti waħda mill-puzzle. Hekk kif l-IA tinfirex f’setturi u nazzjonijiet differenti, is-soċjetà se jkollha bżonn ukoll riċerka indipendenti, infrastruttura pubblika, koordinazzjoni fl-industrija, u oqsma ta’ speċjalizzazzjoni ġodda kompletament. Fil-qosor, dan se jirrikjedi reżiljenza tal-IA.

Għażilna li niffokaw il-ħidma inizjali tagħna fuq erba’ oqsma2 li jinsabu fejn jiltaqgħu riskji kbar u imminenti ma’ impatt immedjat:

  1. Bijo-reżiljenza biex tgħin fil-prevenzjoni ta’ pandemiji inġinerizzati tal-futur;

  2. Reżiljenza ċibernetika biex naħdmu biex niżguraw is-sigurtà tas-sistemi kritiċi tad-dinja tagħna;

  3. Is-sikurezza tal-mudelli tal-IA biex insaħħu l-kontroll tal-umanità fuq il-mudelli li noħolqu; u

  4. L-impatt tal-IA fuq iż-żgħażagħ biex ngħinu nagħmlu t-teknoloġija forza pożittiva għall-ġenerazzjonijiet futuri.

Ix-xogħol tagħna għadu kemm beda. Qed nippjanaw li naqsmu aktar informazzjoni dwar l-istrateġiji tagħna u l-għotjiet inizjali f’kull qasam, u li maż-żmien nespandu għal oqsma oħra.

Bio-resilience

AI will enable biological research to move at unprecedented speed, helping develop new cures and public health improvements that enable us to all live healthier and longer. However, these same capabilities could also be misused by malicious actors, lowering the barrier to designing harmful pathogens.

The age of AI requires a renewed focus on biosecurity. Because advanced AI systems could be misused by bad actors to help create a wide range of biological threats, we will prioritize pathogen-agnostic biosecurity solutions. This will require investments across prevention, detection, and defense. We need to make it harder for malicious actors to access the expertise, equipment, and materials to create biological threats, improve our ability to identify and track novel outbreaks early, and strengthen the technologies—such as protective equipment, indoor air cleaning systems, and medical countermeasures—needed to respond quickly and effectively.

Cyber-resilience

AI has begun to rapidly reshape the cybersecurity landscape. The work that once required specialized teams can now be assisted or automated by capable models. At the same time, rapidly-improving AI capabilities can also be used to accelerate cyberdefenders, including by identifying and patching vulnerabilities and accelerating response.

Many large companies and private actors can spend heavily on cyber to secure their own systems, including with new advances in AI. We anticipate focusing significant resources on securing other important societal actors that are less resourced and will have a much harder time deploying AI-ready cyberdefenses as quickly as needed. In parallel, we are also focused on preparing for novel security challenges that artificial general intelligence will ultimately bring.

AI model safety

AI model safety focuses on the behavior of the systems themselves—whether they are truthful, reliable, and aligned with human intent. In a world where this goes awry, models can break out and behave in unpredictable ways, deceiving us or pursuing goals beyond their design. Getting this right becomes increasingly important as AI systems grow more autonomous and approach—and eventually surpass—human-level intelligence.

AI companies are investing substantial resources in model safety. However, the importance of this challenge calls for a broader, more robust ecosystem: independent institutions to evaluate model safety, public infrastructure to verify models’ safe deployment in practice, and continued advances in alignment science that advance the field broadly.

AI’s impact on young people

Young people are often the earliest adopters of new technologies, using them to learn, create, communicate, and explore the world. AI is no exception. But as these tools become an increasing part of young people’s daily lives, it is critical that we develop a stronger evidence base to understand its impacts.

Families, schools, policymakers, and community organizations are all grappling with questions about how and when young people engage with AI—including its impact on human connection, learning, and development. Our initial focus will be on advancing independent research to help guide those decisions—to better understand where AI can support development, the risks it may introduce, and the contexts that shape those effects.

These insights should drive broad safety standards and design principles that guide how any AI product is developed, how schools choose to deploy them, and if and how families decide to incorporate these technologies into their lives.

The work ahead

There is one critical difference between AI and the technologies that came before it: speed.

Fire resilience took millennia. Electricity resilience took decades. AI resilience is evolving in a matter of years. The systems that make it safe, reliable, and broadly beneficial must be built alongside it.

If we get it right, AI can become part of the foundational infrastructure of modern life—expanding access to knowledge, accelerating discovery, and improving lives at a global scale.

But that outcome isn’t guaranteed. No general purpose technology ever made itself safe.

Resilience is a permanent discipline that requires many people and institutions to build, invest, and collaborate. That is the work ahead, and it is one of the defining challenges of our time. We hope you’ll join us.

Footnotes

  1. 1

    The OpenAI Foundation expects to invest more than $1 billion across several programs over the next year, and $25 billion in AI Resilience and Life Sciences & Curing Disease in the years ahead.

  2. 2

    The economic impacts of AI are part of the broader AI resilience agenda. Given the scale of the economic transition, the Foundation is developing this work as a separate program. Read more here.

  • Thank you to Zach Sims for helping develop this piece.
  • Acknowledgements: Jeff Arnold, Naomi Bashkansky, Sean Coey, Rebecca Distler, Adrien Ecoffet, Tarun Gogineni, Mike Heimowitz, Alice Lee, Leyan Lo, Rodney Manabat, Mike McCormick, Cody Nguyen, Yonadav Shavit, Kendal Simon, Divya Siddarth, Jacob Trefethen.